Ungodly packet loss rates

Mailman List Mirror (Read Only)
1

Yes, and I think the operative word is "shared" as in "shared
access media".

--Kent

~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~
Kent W. England Six Sigma Networks
1655 Landquist Drive, Suite 100 Voice/Fax: 619.632.8400
Encinitas, CA 92024 kwe@6SigmaNets.com
Experienced Internet Consulting ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~

2

One can certainly make the argument that running large traffic

   >flows through shared interconnects is bad engineering

   Yes, and I think the operative word is "shared" as in "shared
   access media".

Shared access to the media is not relevant. Scalability of the shared
media is. Private interconnects are simply more scalable than shared
interconnects.

I trust that an example is not necessary.

Tony