Hello,
Checking Email Functionality.
Hosting Support
Thank you,
Why did moderation let this through the filters? I don’t believe that testing email functionality is the intended use case of the NANOG mailing list.
Also worth noting that the website for the domain this came from says the owner of the site specializes in “anti-spam”, which based on this email alone doesn’t look to be the case. Anyone else agree?
Regards,
Peter
I did not send this to the list. I assume the admins are testing out what has been blocking my emails for the past month and somehow this email slipped thru. Just ignore and delete.
-Hank
Novices 
This is like setting a read-receipt-to: to a mailing list. The results
are phenom !
But on the other hand you get a nice handy list of replies that say "did
not read" 
leaking their address as a member.
Done this by accident myself 
Sir - that so sounds like the move of a Cogent rep
ha ha
This was not sent by the list admin team. The email was sent via bluehost.
The MX for interall.co.il is blocking connections from the nanog list MX.
# dig +noall +answer mx interall.co.il
interall.co.il. 7133 IN MX 0 mail.interall.co.il.
# telnet mail.interall.co.il. 25
Trying 162.241.224.86...
^C
# dig +noall +answer -x 162.241.224.86
86.224.241.162.in-addr.arpa. 86390 IN PTR box5171.bluehost.com.
# ping 162.241.224.86
PING 162.241.224.86 (162.241.224.86) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 162.241.224.86: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=26.5 ms
64 bytes from 162.241.224.86: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=26.6 ms
^C
- --- 162.241.224.86 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.563/26.589/26.615/0.026 ms
# telnet mail.interall.co.il. 80
Trying 162.241.224.86...
^C
I'm open to testing further, but I don't think this is an issue on the nanog
listserver or it's network.
- --
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net