So in other words if an fcn host is found to be originating denial of
service attacks, you suggest we contact the local police and FBI rather
than ringing you up and asking you to disable their ongoing attacks.
And in the time it takes to process a court order you will continue to
allow those hosts to originate smurf/pingfloods etc.
Gotcha. So noted.
So we now know that when an fcn host is conducting denial of service
attacks, we should immediately start the paperwork filing for criminal
negligence and punitive damages ahead of time.
-Dan
> FCN gives no contacts for the Domain names
<snip long winded ____>
> nosey nerds, it's none of your darned business.
So we now know that when an fcn host is conducting denial of service
attacks, we should immediately start the paperwork filing for criminal
negligence and punitive damages ahead of time.
It seems like what he is really saying is if you are under DOS from one of
FCN's host, don't pass go, don't collect $200, just go straight to his
upstream provider and inform them that one of their customers, FCN, is the
originating network of (insert DOS type) and ask that they turn down that
connection until the problem is resolved. This way Bob's "innocent"
customers will lose their net access at the same time as his "guilty" ones
would. In the process giving him something else to complain about on NANOG
(which is likely the real reason he endorses this plan)...
Just my theory of course, I mean I COULD be wrong.
Tim