Unnamed Administration sources reported that Chrisy Luke said:
The service providers are not the enemies. If you treat them like enemies
then enemies they will become.
That's right; no service provider will ever harbor spammers just
to make a quick buck. It's never happened, and never will.....
David Lesher wrote (on Jun 20):
> The service providers are not the enemies. If you treat them like enemies
> then enemies they will become.That's right; no service provider will ever harbor spammers just
to make a quick buck. It's never happened, and never will.....
Name the ones that do. All of them. Name the ones that will.
You can't. So don't tar the rest of us with the same brush just
because you can't identify the good from the bad.
Assuming everyone is bad somewhat goes against the principles of some of
our countries.
Overall, it's not the solution. Just band-aid to make it go away for a
while. To hide it. And annoy quite a few "good" providers in the process.
(I use the term "your" loosely here, I do not intend to imply your good
self)
-C
chinanet
-Dan
There is actually a guy trying to clean up Chinanet now. @Home was my
favorite example before they went titsup.com. Just about any of the Korean
providers would be a good current example.
A guy. Singular. I'm not going to hold my breath, unless he has the
authority to deploy military forces. 
The guy "cleaning up" Chinanet should be given a medal, ..no better yet, we should ask everyone in the US who's ever been spammed from them to send in a US dollar to be forwarded to this guy....something tells me he's overworked and his job doesn't pay much....he needs to be supported in his endless endeavor..perhaps they'd hire some more to help him?
When he's done there, he's got a job waiting for him forever it would appear...
Shutting off sections of the Internet seems to be counterproductive to me...if this continues unabated, we will see connectivity diminish over time, and the Internet de-construct itself.