> I've encountered some anti-spammers who would do half-
> assed investigations, declare an ISP guilty, then
> spread the word on private mailing lists shared
> by all sorts of hackers, who are apparently looking
> for an excuse to have fun and feel good about it.
That would have been me.
> Despite our policy of not allowing spams from our
> network, we were labeled spammer friendly not too
> long ago and a minor break-in happened the same
> night. Just speculating, too.
That would not have been me.
Tell me about it. In the course of today's activities, I
learned that one of our users with a small commercial web site
on one of our servers spammed the net from an account on
another ISP. The spam contained a pointer to his URL on
Some of the mail seems to be holding us partially culpable
for the spam. I'm happy to report that the other ISP is taking
action against the spam complaint, but I don't know of any
interpretation of Netiquette that condemns commercial WWW sites.
I am ecstatic about commercial web sites.
I don't know that I'd favor an abuse policy that encompasses
WWW sites, even if they are listed elsewhere in spam mailings,
but if there's a reasonable policy out there that contemplates
this type of situation, I'd love to know how it reads.
If you sell service to someone who then spams elsewhere to advertise
resources you sold them, then you are enabling the spam. I will expect
you to warn them not to ever do this again, then disconnect them if they
And I will expect you to amend your terms and conditions to specify that
spam is unacceptable, that you consider it theft of service, and that you
will NOT allow your customers to commit this, whether or not they use your
facilities to do so.
There is plenty of clean money to be made on the internet. If all you
sell to are the good guys who eschew spamming (or, even better, help to
fight it) then you will still make a pile of money in the service business.
(Probably more since you won't have to spend time answering complaints.)