SLAAC renumbering problems ([v6ops] draft-gont-v6ops-slaac-renum **Call for adoption**)


A while ago some of us started working on an IETF draft to document and
mitigate some issues experienced by SLAAC in the face of some
renumbering events. Such work has resulted in three small documents.

* draft-gont-v6ops-slaac-renum (problem statement)
* draft-gont-v6ops-slaac-renum (CPE recommendations)
* draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum (proposed protocol updates)

Two of such documents are being discussed at the v6ops wg of the IETF,
where there are ongoing calls for adoption for two of them.

* The "problem statement" document
( is being
discussed at the v6ops wg of the IETF in this thread:

* The "CPE recommendations" document
( is being
discussed in the same group/list, in this thread:

Feedback will be highly appreciated, particularly if on the v6ops wg