Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif.

I don't think that this will work for a business viewpoint - someone
will end up giving at least some of these ISPs free transit.

See the attached message that I sent to big-internet earlier this
month. My comments apply to metro-based addressing or
interconnect-based addressing or similar schemes.
  --asp@uunet.uu.net (Andrew Partan)

  The one way around this is to have all of the players participating
  in such a scheme form a "co-op", so that "long-haul" folks only
  sign one transit agreement, with the co-op.

  A few tweeks to the MPLA's at the AADS and PACBELL NAPS, regarding
  this technique might fly. At least they are a starting point for such
  discussions.