RE: New Root Name Servers

@ >Also, is it possible that the recent problems NANOG
@ >people have been discussing regarding Root Name Servers
@ >is really the result of these transitions to TRUE Root
@ >Name Servers ?
@ If whatever you are doing, however you are implimenting it
@ for whatever reasons, caused corrupted data in
@ and the subsequent failures, then you are a menace to the network
@ and should cease and desist activities. You have clearly stated
@ that your servers don't carry the .com domain directly; if you do
@ something which crashes the servers that do carry .com you will
@ likely find yourself sucking air over your ether pipes.
@ You could, of course, merely be confused about what happened a
@ few days ago. I would hope this is the case.
@ -george william herbert
@ It's time for another run of my occational disclaimer:
@ I have not been a CRL employee for over 2 years now and in no way
@ am associated with it at this time except as a end-user of shell
@ account services.

This is very interesting....

The activities that I have been referring to are
being coordinated by Mr. Jon Postel (IANA)
and Network Solutions, Inc.

I guess you need to check with Mr. Postel
if you want to accuse people of being a
"menace to the network"....