RE:Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.

And since those puppies are going to need a reload after adjustment make sure your not exposed to the component decay issue for cards manufactured between 2005-2010 or you could have a interesting night.

We've hit that issue on three different 7600 chassis.

Darin

And since those puppies are going to need a reload after adjustment make

sure your not exposed to the component decay issue for cards manufactured
between 2005-2010 or you could have a interesting night.

We've hit that issue on three different 7600 chassis.

Darin

You are not the only one, major manufacturing defects...

http://www.cisco.com/go/memory

From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver

Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:39 AM

To: 'nanog@nanog.org'

Subject: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600
routers.

Hi all,

I am wondering if maybe we should make some kind of
concerted effort to remind folks about the IPv4 routing table inching

closer

and closer to the 512K route mark.

We are at about 94/95% right now of 512K.

For most of us, the 512K route mark is arbitrary but for
a lot of folks who may still be running 6500/7600 or other routers which

are by

default configured to crash and burn after 512K routes; it may be a

valuable

public service.

Even if you don't have this scenario in your network
today; chances are you connect to someone who connects to someone who

connects