>>> P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems
with 128/8 and
>>>> 133/8 as well so my apologies to people who may have
>>> 22.214.171.124/9 too.
>> Yes, legacy blocks (with large number of smaller
>> datasize during processing exceeded certain amount. The
bad data was
>> present at 2 of 4 servers for duration of the night but
dns was being
> so 50+% of your system was hozed for some long period of
>> changes same time as well, so I don't know how much affect
>> but apparently considerable; this is the most serious
problem in months.
> 'most serious problem in months' ... this has happened in
> during the past 'months' ? yikes... is that noted on your
site so users of
> the 'service' will know what sorts of 'problems' they might be
> encountering due to their reliance on this 'service'?
I wonder how many problems cymru has had in that period? I'm
guess not so
I mean this in a nice way, really. Look. Smiley.
Use a blacklist, pay the price. I'd like to know how many
people actually went to their boss and said "It was that guy
Williams fault even though I control and am responsible for the