We requested our initial allocation without any such questions. Is this
your initial or additional?
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED x106
Initial. Documenting IPv4 usage is in the request template.
It also looks like there isn't a policy for orgs with multiple
multihomed sites to get a /48 per site. Is there an exception policy
somewhere?
Don't remember about the v4 part, but 3 years ago they issued me a /48, specifically for my first site and indicated that a block was reserved for additional sites. I can probably dig that up.
Some policies allow you to use your IPv4 usage as justification of your need
for IPv6. If you are applying under one of those policies, you need to fill in
that information. If you are applying under a different qualification criteria,
I believe you can leave that section blank.
Owen
From the NRPM:
6.11. IPv6 Multiple Discrete Networks
Organizations with multiple discrete IPv6 networks desiring to request new or additional address space under a single Organization ID must meet the following criteria:
The organization shall be a single entity and not a consortium of smaller independent entities.
The organization must have compelling criteria for creating discrete networks. Examples of a discrete network might include:
Regulatory restrictions for data transmission,
Geographic distance and diversity between networks,
Autonomous multihomed discrete networks.
The organization must keep detailed records on how it has allocated space to each location, including the date of each allocation.
The organization should notify ARIN at the time of the request their desire to apply this policy to their account.
Requests for additional space:
Organization must specify on the application which discreet network(s) the request applies to
Each network will be judged against the existing utilization criteria specified in 6.5.2 as if it were a separate organization, rather than collectively as would be done for requests outside of this policy
If that doesn't meet your need, please contact me off list with more information.
Owen
But how is it relevant? Ever? It's like a bank asking you to justify your
need for a loan by asking you how many apples you can pick in an hour.
You're asking for a loan to plant an orchard. Oranges this time, but
you've only ever grown apples.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
Hello Adam:
You may want to post this on the ARIN PPML list since the policy folks are all there. They will be able to point your directly to the portion of the NPRM that applies. In addition, this would be the appropriate list to submit policy changes if you don't like the way things are being done now.
Regards,
Mike
(Yeah, high reply latency...)
Is Carrier V still filtering at sub-/32 on their IPv6 peerings? Last I was in a position to check, not even Apple's /45 was visible from inside AS701.
-C
(Yeah, high reply latency...)
Is Carrier V still filtering at sub-/32 on their IPv6 peerings? Last I was in a position to check, not even Apple's /45 was visible from inside AS701.
evidence says that they are now accepting longer prefixes.
I discussed this with Randy Whitney a few months ago. He informed me that they had
been taking down to /48s for some time now.
Owen