RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)

@> As part of the educational effort you might want to add information about
@> IPng (IPv6) as well as RFC 1918...this may help to give people hope...
@
@Until there's an operational plan for simplifying routing by using IPng,
@I think we'll avoid mentioning it since it begs the question "If we can't
@route 2^32 addresses..."
@
@> Jim Fleming
@
@Avi
@

Yes...that is why we are coding as fast as we can on C+@nIP (or IPv8)...:slight_smile: