qwest.net dropping packets... wife would like someone to pick them up please...

Hi all,

Hope you're all getting on top of Sandy.

Trying to hit kajabi.com, I'm getting up to 60% packet loss off qwest.net - dca2-edge-02.inet.qwest.net

A bit of quick googleing and we assumed that they're on the west coast of US, so please excuse (and just ignore me) if you're on the east coast and this is being caused by all the Sandy issues (yes I've been following the Outage list and think you guys are just doing an amazing job right now!!!)

Re the subject - told the wife that her problem is likely being caused by packets being dropped by qwest, her response "can someone pick them up for me plse :)"

mx.8013.yournet.co.nz (0.0.0.0) Sat Nov 3 16:43:18 2012
Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
                                        Packets Pings
  Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
  1. router 0.0% 39 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0
  2. ???
  3. 218.101.61.101 0.0% 39 9.1 21.8 7.0 173.6 33.4
  4. ie2-g-0-0-0.telstraclear.net 0.0% 39 38.0 22.9 19.6 38.0 3.5
  5. ge-0-2-0-1.xcore1.acld.telstracl 0.0% 39 22.2 22.9 18.9 38.5 3.9
  6. unknown.telstraglobal.net 0.0% 39 23.4 22.1 17.6 26.4 1.4
  7. i-0-6-1-0.tlot-core01.bx.telstra 0.0% 39 153.4 153.3 151.2 163.9 2.3
  8. i-4-2.eqla01.bi.telstraglobal.ne 0.0% 39 147.0 154.8 143.5 313.8 27.7
  9. lap-brdr-04.inet.qwest.net 0.0% 39 154.2 154.5 152.0 159.2 1.6
10. dca2-edge-02.inet.qwest.net 10.5% 39 221.0 223.1 217.1 247.6 6.6
11. 67.133.224.194 0.0% 39 220.8 222.2 216.3 268.6 8.1
12. 72.21.220.161 0.0% 39 221.2 225.3 217.6 268.2 10.8
13. 72.21.222.139 0.0% 38 220.9 222.8 216.6 266.6 7.5
14. 216.182.224.8 0.0% 38 221.3 223.2 220.5 243.9 4.1
15. ???

D

Hi Don,

based on your mtr output, there's no loss to the
end destination; one router along the path showing
loss that does not continue to affect the rest of the
path simply means the cpu on that router is a bit
too busy to respond to icmp messages; but there's
0% loss beyond it, which means it's doing its primary
job of forwarding packets just fine.

Thanks, and have a wonderful weekend!

Matt

Hi Matt (and other helpful posters off list),

Yes, makes sense.

I'm told this pops up twice a month, so opps, clearly I need to spend more time reading and learning! :slight_smile:

Thanks to the person who pointed out the PTR rec suggests that the impacted resource might be more west than I realised. I confess I don't know the .us very well at all.

D

one router along the path showing loss that does not continue to
affect the rest of the path simply means the cpu on that router
is a bit too busy to respond to icmp messages

trivial footnote: some folk configure some routers to rate limit
icmp

randy

other trivial footnote, not all traceroute is icmp.

True, wrt to destination. However all intermediate(including penultimate) hops reveal themselves via ICMP type 11 Code 0 (TTL exceeded in transit)
./Randy

For some more information, this previous document and presentation make
good resources:

Document:

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Sunday/RAS_Traceroute_N47_Sun.pdf

There's also a presentation here:

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Interpret_traceroutes.wmv