Our mailer tries to deliver mail to 131.119.250.119 (bargate.silvaco.com,
SILVACO.BARRNET.NET) and gets host unreachable. Routes for 131.119.0.0 are
given as:
gw3#sh ip ro 131.119.0.0
Routing entry for 131.119.0.0 (mask 255.255.255.0), 2 known subnets
Redistributing via igrp 51771
B 131.119.246.0 [200/100] via 193.23.5.33, 16:10:55
B 131.119.253.0 [200/100] via 193.23.5.33, 16:11:51
gw3#sh ip bgp 131.119.246.0
BGP routing table entry for 131.119.246.0/255.255.255.0, version 2409868
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
1273 1755 1800 1239 1280 200
193.23.5.33 (metric 108166) from 192.54.104.130, localpref 100, weight 210
Origin IGP, valid, internal, best
gw3#sh ip bgp 131.119.253.0
BGP routing table entry for 131.119.253.0/255.255.255.0, version 2409849
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
1273 1755 1800 1239 1280 200
193.23.5.33 (metric 108166) from 192.54.104.130, localpref 100, weight 210
Origin IGP, valid, internal, best
Is it useful to add Class-B-Subnets to the routing table whilst we are
trying to reduce Class-C entries?
Regards,
Arnold