Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps
old news.
Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt?
Darn it
Thanks in advance
Should your users perhaps be going to whitehouse.gov?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
There's something wrong with this reality. Maybe we can redirect that too.
Domain Name:WHITEHOUSE.ORG
Created On:05-Sep-1995 04:00:00 UTC
Last Updated On:23-Jan-2006 19:17:13 UTC
Expiration Date:04-Sep-2015 04:00:00 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Network Solutions LLC (R63-LROR)
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:23421300-NSI
Registrant Name:Satire On-line
Registrant Organization:Satire On-line
Registrant Street1:245-M Mount Hermon Road, Suite 137
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Scotts Valley
Registrant State/Province:CA
Registrant Postal Code:95066
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.6502123765
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:+1.9999999999
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:pace@ILLUMINATI.ORG
Something tells me, this isn't the whitehouse your customers were looking for.
Joe Blanchard wrote:
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps
old news.
whitehouse.gov does not equal whitehouse.org .
And some of us who have been around for a while can attest with some certainty that whitehouse.gov DEFINITELY doesn't equal whitehouse.com . 
Oh I don't know...what about during the Clinton years?
whitehouse.org has had the same A record for quite some time, sharing the ip
with a bunch of other .. interesting .. sites.
It's been at 67.19.217.250 for years now. If your info matches that,
there's no DNS issues to worry about.
-j