Maybe I'm missing something here, but wouldn't these Denial of Service
attacks cause a severe mismatch in the numbers of SYNs and SYN-ACKs on a
given router interface?If so, then couldn't we just sweet-talk cisco into providing 5 minute
counts of syns and syn-acks on an interface? You know something like:5 minute SYNS: 123423 5 minute SYN-ACKS: 50000
Then, if the ratio got too high, it can start yelping about "Potential SYN
D-O-S Atttack in progress on Interface Serial 1"
Interesting. Asymmetry might mean that it'd go undetected, except
towards the site being affected (except towards the site being attacked,
if they're singly-homed).
What you'd *really* like is a count of SYNS by source MAC address at
(i.e. at an exchange point), but what you suggest is interesting.
In this manner "good" isp's wouldn't unknowingly carry these attacks. I
envision this being done on the somewhat bigger isp's where putting
inbound filters on their customer interfaces would be not a good idea
(Sprint, MCI, Net 99, etc.). If the feature was enabled by default, some
smaller ISPs would probably notice it--if they are watching their cisco
logs at all.Personally, I know that these attacks aren't going to originate at our
site, as I have the filters on. However, I am quite concerned about
getting hit with one...
Avi