A recent organizational change at my company has put someone in charge
who is determined to make things perfect. We are a service provider,
isn't a common occurrence, and the engineer in question has a pristine
track record.
This outage, of a high profile customer, triggered upper management to
react by calling a meeting just days after. Put bluntly, we've been
told "Human errors are unacceptable, and they will be completely
eliminated. One is too many."
who's side are you on?
Just before answering think about the opportunities and threats before consider having sex! You just need to know how to protect yourself. Not to everyone’s taste but pregnancy can be prevented after intercourse by taking emergency contraceptive pills (EC). Other chose paracetamol- apparently is a painkiller that lowers high temperature.
Provided that you take the correct dose at the right intervals, paracetamol is relatively safe. An overdose is dangerous.
you might not get this .....but going to bed late has an huge impact on our health.
If a main issue has dependencies then the main issue has to be resolved. Hopefully, you've seen that all good things have a dark side,
This is a golden opportunity.
Prepare a pan for building the lab necessary to pre-test EVERYTHING.
Cost it out.
Present the cost and the plan in a public forum or widely distributed memorandum (including as a minimum everybody that was at the meeting and everybody in the chain(s) of command between you and the edict giver.
A recent organizational change at my company has put someone in charge
who is determined to make things perfect. We are a service provider,isn't a common occurrence, and the engineer in question has a pristine
track record.This outage, of a high profile customer, triggered upper management to
react by calling a meeting just days after. Put bluntly, we've been
told "Human errors are unacceptable, and they will be completely
eliminated. One is too many."
----------------------------------------------------------------From experience...
At one point this will become overwhelming. You'll wake up every
morning dreading going to
work instead of looking forward to it. Chain shot will be put in the
'blame cannon' and
blasted regularly and at everyone. Update your resume and get
everything in place just in
case it gets to the point you can't take it anymore sooner than you
expect.This is a golden opportunity.
Prepare a pLan for building the lab necessary to pre-test EVERYTHING.
Plan. Prepare a plan.
>>
>> A recent organizational change at my company has put someone in charge
>> who is determined to make things perfect. We are a service provider,
>>
>> isn't a common occurrence, and the engineer in question has a pristine
>> track record.
>>
>> This outage, of a high profile customer, triggered upper management to
>> react by calling a meeting just days after. Put bluntly, we've been
>> told "Human errors are unacceptable, and they will be completely
>> eliminated. One is too many."
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>> From experience...
>>
>> At one point this will become overwhelming. You'll wake up every
>> morning dreading going to
>> work instead of looking forward to it. Chain shot will be put in the
>> 'blame cannon' and
>> blasted regularly and at everyone. Update your resume and get
>> everything in place just in
>> case it gets to the point you can't take it anymore sooner than you
>> expect.
>
>
> This is a golden opportunity.
>
> Prepare a pLan for building the lab necessary to pre-test EVERYTHING.Plan. Prepare a plan.
>
> Cost it out.
>
> Present the cost and the plan in a public forum or widely distributed
> memorandum (including as a minimum everybody that was at the meeting and
> everybody in the chain(s) of command between you and the edict giver.
>
>
Problem is, when the inevitable human error does occur, the expensive
lab then just looks like it was a huge waste of money, and that the
networking people took advantage of the situation to build a play
ground. They'll then likely be shown the door.
The only way to completely eliminate human error is to eliminate the
humans - from everything - hardware design, software design, deployment
and maintenance.
Actually, come to think of it, there is a way to eliminate human error.
Staff netops with monkeys, and as long as management don't work out
that they've now got "monkey error", they'll be happy. When they cotton
on to that, replace monkey error with goat error. Then sheep error.
Then hamster error. etc. etc. By the time they run out of types of
animal error, they'll realise how wonderful human error really is!
Present the cost and the plan in a public forum or widely distributed
memorandum (including as a minimum everybody that was at the meeting and
everybody in the chain(s) of command between you and the edict giver.
Problem is, when the inevitable human error does occur, the expensive
lab then just looks like it was a huge waste of money, and that the
networking people took advantage of the situation to build a play
ground. They'll then likely be shown the door.
I can't imagine wanting to work at a place like that anyway.
The only way to completely eliminate human error is to eliminate the
humans - from everything - hardware design, software design, deployment
and maintenance.
This may be a little heavy on the philosophy, but there has to be a human in there somewhere.
And, will I don't have any statistics at all, I sense that machine failures probably exceed human failures in rate and severity.
Certainly there are assists that make sense.
And by the way, what difference does it make if you get fired because a machine "replaced" you and getting fired because somebody made a mistake?
