If you are happy with the proposal that NSI continue to be the monopoly
registrar, for an extra 2 years, then do nothing.
Otherwise, perhaps you would be willing to send _your_ anecdotal
experience to someone that could do something about it: your government
minister, your US Congressional Representative or Senator, or the
persons that schedule hearings on these matters.
If a US person or company, you might want to send a short note ASKING
for the House Science committee (probably the technology sub-committee)
to meet to review the NSF/NSI imbroglio, or ASKING for the House
Commerce committee to review the Magaziner proposed Rule. Here are the
general contacts:
James Sensenbrenner
Science Committee
2320 Rayburn
Washington DC 20515
Connie Morella
Science Technology sub-committee
2319 Rayburn
Washington DC 20515
Thomas Blyley
Commerce Committee
2125 Rayburn
Washington DC 20515
John Dingell
Commerce Committee
2125 Rayburn
Washington DC 20515
WSimpson@UMich.edu
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32