Internic busted

If you are happy with the proposal that NSI continue to be the monopoly
registrar, for an extra 2 years, then do nothing.

Otherwise, perhaps you would be willing to send _your_ anecdotal
experience to someone that could do something about it: your government
minister, your US Congressional Representative or Senator, or the
persons that schedule hearings on these matters.

If a US person or company, you might want to send a short note ASKING
for the House Science committee (probably the technology sub-committee)
to meet to review the NSF/NSI imbroglio, or ASKING for the House
Commerce committee to review the Magaziner proposed Rule. Here are the
general contacts:

  James Sensenbrenner
  Science Committee
  2320 Rayburn
  Washington DC 20515

  Connie Morella
  Science Technology sub-committee
  2319 Rayburn
  Washington DC 20515

  Thomas Blyley
  Commerce Committee
  2125 Rayburn
  Washington DC 20515

  John Dingell
  Commerce Committee
  2125 Rayburn
  Washington DC 20515
    Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32

Your government is concerned about Resources that affect commerce.

There is a Green Paper that should be reviewed by all those who are

invloved with DNS.

                                NASA Integrated Services Network (NISN)
                                ( formally NASA Science Internet (NSI) )
                                Root Nameserver Staff Member/
        NASA Educational Research Network (NREN)/
                                Next Generation Internet (NGI)
            Steve Shultz

         _/_/_/ Opinions expressed are those of the \_\_\_\_
      _/_/_/_/ addressor ONLY [unless where noted]. \_\_\_\_\_
    _/_/_/_/ \_\_\_\_\_\_
  _/_/_/_/ NASA Ames Research Center / Sterling Software \_\_\_\_\_\_\_