Independent space from ARIN

The solution to the problems posted in this thread about ARIN is fairly
simple. It's time to deregulate the IP address market and convert to a
free market approach to allocating IP addresses. If address space could
be bought and sold on a free market you would no longer have to justify
your address space to anyone, saving untold amount of resources and costs
pulling these reports together. Of course, address space wouldn't be
wasted the way it is today by organizations that hoard it, or by companies
that go out of business because it would make sound financial sense to
sell what you don't need.

God no, as can be seen with the DNS, free-market leads directly to
hoarding by those who have the resources, because it is considered
an investment in a cornered market.

It leads directly to a tragedy of the commons where 90% of the resources
get sucked up by 10% of the companies, and those who need address space
get extorted.

I'll know the net is dead if this ever comes about. While not perfect,
an objective 3rd party custodian is by far a better solution.

Who do you trust to be objective?

-Dan

> I'll know the net is dead if this ever comes about. While not perfect,
> an objective 3rd party custodian is by far a better solution.

Who do you trust to be objective?

-Dan

The fact that everybody seems to hate ARIN probably means they
are about as objective as humanly possible.
:slight_smile:

bdragon@gweep.net wrote:

God no, as can be seen with the DNS, free-market leads directly to
hoarding by those who have the resources, because it is considered
an investment in a cornered market.

I guess opportunity cost doesn't factor in to your analysis?

It leads directly to a tragedy of the commons where 90% of the resources
get sucked up by 10% of the companies, and those who need address space
get extorted.

Whether or not what you describe would happen, it's certainly not a tragedy of the commons. Google should help clear up your confusion.

Bradley