We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else?
Yes, pretty well everyone else.
Yes, close to double normal traffic here in south-west Ontario, Canada.
---Mike
We are seeing about 150% increase in traffic as well.
-Patrick
:We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing
:almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else?
We're seeing traffic levels nearly 2x normal. On 9/11/01, we were
probably only about 50% higher than the norm. Of course, lots has
changed, so that's probably not a fair comparison.
Jay Hennigan wrote:
We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else?
Ditto. I'm suddenly glad we paid for that "burstable" option
David Smith
MVN.net
Yep, most seems to be port 8247. Which seems to be CNN streaming
service.
And yay for the p2p options now in flash... nothing like that to make it
look like a comp'd system/attack.
--Harry
As an aside... thanks to BBC for streaming this, I couldn't find
another source that wasn't overloaded/jerky/ugly
Thanks Brandon.
-Chris
BitGravity did a great job.
We're seeing more TCP1935 than UDP8247.
http://ct-mail.cites.uiuc.edu/~hardenrm/graphs/Peakflow-1.png
/Ryan
Harry Hoffman wrote:
Yep, most seems to be port 8247. Which seems to be CNN streaming
service.And yay for the p2p options now in flash... nothing like that to make it
look like a comp'd system/attack.--Harry
We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing
almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else?We are seeing about 150% increase in traffic as well.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Muldoon
Network/Software Engineer
INOC (http://www.inoc.net)
PGPKEY (http://www.inoc.net/~doon)
Key ID: 0x370D752CI'm sorry a pentium won't do, you need an SGI to connect with us.
- --
Ryan M. Harden, BS, KC9IHX Office: 217-265-5192
CITES - Network Engineering Cell: 630-363-0365
2130 Digital Computer Lab Fax: 217-244-7089
1304 W. Springfield email: hardenrm@illinois.edu
Urbana, IL 61801
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
University of Illinois - ICCN
Peering sessions to Limelight tripled in downstream today. No problems, just a lot of traffic. Total aggregate into our network nearly doubled, but we service a lot of SMB and government agencies in the DC area, most of which had today off or telecommuted.
-evt
>
> We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing
> almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone
else?
>
> --
> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net
> Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/
> Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDVPeering sessions to Limelight tripled in downstream today. No
problems, just a lot of traffic. Total aggregate into our network
nearly doubled, but we service a lot of SMB and government agencies in
the DC area, most of which had today off or telecommuted.-evt
Port 1935 to LimeLight is what we saw as well. All is back to normal at this point.
Jay Hennigan wrote:
We're a regional ISP, about 80% SMB 20% residential. We're seeing
almost double our normal downstream traffic right now. Anyone else?
Yes, tres beaucoups.
Mostly udp/8247 for the streaming (CNN). But oddly enough, for a given
client, more outbound traffic than inbound. Streaming gone peer-to-peer?
Jeff
CNN is using Octoshape's P2P plug-in with Flash.
Marcello Azambuja
Nearly every major CDN or web host was involved with the inauguration
in some manner, with no reported issues to speak of.
Some "facilities-based" providers even placed infrastructure with
their competitors to be extra certain they could handle the traffic
spike.
With so many involved, and in the interests of full disclosure, do you
or Comcast have any fiscal interest in BitGravity's streaming of this
event?
Drive Slow
Paul Wall
During the inauguration our traffic was higher than normal, but levels only
reached our average daily peak. More specifically, we climbed to our
average daily peak earlier than normal, and it stayed at a sustained rate,
but it didn't break any records here.
Frank
The Beeb's HD multicast feed is about 23Mbit/s to the host, and we received
it at quite decent (subjective) quality here on a JANET-connected university
site. The feed runs continuously (as far as any 'as-is' test stream does
and this morning is pretty flawless.
The interesting aspect of the HD stream was seeing how various systems coped
with the CPU load. It was good to have some HD content available that
encouraged people to install vlc, find out a little about multicast, and
system issues in receiving it.
Thanks again Beeb
Interesting read on yesterday's streaming. My experiences seem to
mirror a lot of what is written here:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/21/the-day-live-web-video-streaming-failed-us/
-Jim P.
Is there a general study done on the overall impact of inauguration streaming traffic ?
any summary on what is the overall gain of bandwidth, etc.
Arbor had a good writeup on the traffic that they saw.
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/01/the-great-obama-traffic-flood/
Regards,
James Pleger