I have a client who is now peering with BBN. BBN supplied a /30 as follows: is their side via a company they purchased called Nap.Net.
The DNS shows:

Thats ok. The other side is the customer colo router and the IP of shows:

Now I claim that the domain (based on Internic data) is some
company in WV and has nothing to do with us (ianet is the customer name we
were assigned by BBN). BBN claims that is this their "standard naming
convention" for assigning customer interface names.

Traceroutes will show up with in the path. I claim this is in
violation of some RFC. Am I wrong? There may be many such PTR records
within BBN for "".