http://www.circleid.com/articles/2539.asp
and i expect so will freedom fighters in china et. al. Maybe the subject
of a future interview. and the biggest question of all, will china block
the ipv6 protocol for homeland security reasons?
i look forward to some answers.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
Not commenting on some of the fantasies in the article....
From what I remember China is pretty is active in IPv6 and from the APNIC presentations they also have a allocation. Not sure how come to the conclusions you do....
- kurtis -
Not commenting on some of the fantasies in the article....
you should point out any fantasies you find in the article. i can support
my findings with facts. fiction is a best a condition dictated by
bureacrats, and on the internet that end up a comedy of errors. ipv6 is
an end control system at this time in an ipv6 cloud where the ends are
under complete end user control. i love ipv6. am looking forward to
playing with it.
From what I remember China is pretty is active in IPv6 and from the
APNIC presentations they also have a allocation. Not sure how come to
the conclusions you do....
who cares. China is not aware of the security implications to the
homeland. china is after all a nation ruled by madarines. the colours of
authority change with the wind but the rules of the mandarine class has
not ended. order is critical to the natural balance of chiness society.
ipv6 challenges order. so what will the nat wall of china do now. i
shall of course be investigating. i think icann goes to china next 
cheers
joe
Could further nonsense in this direction please be sent to a newsgroup
like alt.test please?
Nanog is hardly the place for such incisive analysis of the current
political order or social structures of China.
And it's Mandarin. Capitalized even. Which suggests the depth of
research which has obviously gone into this.
hey - the chiness are a speciality of mine
lynx www.dot-god.com/bod/jb/chinasponsor.html
and these are issues that we are going to have to deal with. and it's no
picnic for the people who have to manage ipv6 infrastructure. the chines
are the least of our concerns.
cheers
joe baptista
p.s. i still have no idea where the fantasy in my article exists. so far
i just see i-society complaints of madness but no substance.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
i try not to bother in conferences. if my spelling confuses anyone just
ask and i'll clarify.
cheers
joe baptista
I think the only thing confusing people is why you continue to post
self-serving lunacy to the list.
Andy
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andy Dills 301-682-9972
Xecunet, LLC www.xecu.net
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access
i try not to bother in conferences. if my spelling confuses anyone just
ask and i'll clarify.I think the only thing confusing people is why you continue to post
self-serving lunacy to the list.
no, we're long used to that. and most have filters for joe.
what confuses us is why folk reply to him
randy
RFC1925 Part 2.4
Because people keep responding to him. Trust me, ignoring him is the only
thing that works.