ftc shuts down a colo and ip provider

Mailman List Mirror (Read Only)
1

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/06/ftc_sues_shuts_down_n_calif_we.html

while allegedly a black hat, this is the first case i know of in which
the usg has shut down an isp. nose of camel? first they came for ...

randy

2

Randy Bush wrote:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/06/ftc_sues_shuts_down_n_calif_we.html

while allegedly a black hat, this is the first case i know of in which
the usg has shut down an isp. nose of camel? first they came for ...

randy

Foonet.

3

there have been a few other smaller ones, it'd be nice of L3 and Peer1
would also stop routing these folks assets:

* 68.233.192.0/24 200.160.127.238 0 27664
16735 12956 3356 i
* 68.233.193.0/24 200.160.127.238 0 27664
16735 12956 3356 i
* 68.233.194.0/24 200.160.127.238 0 27664
16735 12956 3356 i
* 68.233.195.0/24 200.160.127.238 0 27664
16735 12956 3356 i
*> 68.233.196.0/24 74.40.7.35 0 0 5650 3561
13768 13768 13768 ?
*> 68.233.197.0/24 74.40.7.35 0 0 5650 3561
13768 13768 13768 ?
*> 68.233.198.0/24 74.40.7.35 0 0 5650 3561
13768 13768 13768 ?
*> 68.233.199.0/24 74.40.7.35 0 0 5650 3561
13768 13768 13768 ?

thanks!
-Chris

4

I'm curious...what do you think should be done about webhosting providers who do harm to others?
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/pushdo.htm

--Michael

5

It's good to see them finally taking action. I see what you are saying, but this isn't the case of "maybe kindof bad"

6

Don't mention Spamhaus (versus nic.at)

Maybe that is the reason why they introduced censoring the day before yesterday here in germany.

Just got a nice stop sign when I looked up spamhaus
saying the site is inapropriate for my computer.

Don't believe it - it's just been a bad dream.
I fully agree with what they did (not spamhaus or our government of coarse)

Kind regards
Peter

Jo Rhett wrote: