draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

RFC7349 is a nice summary of everything we¹re still missing wrt MPLS and
is relatively recent so should be close to up to date. In addition to the
MPLS shortcomings, it also touches on recent IGP updates:

3.2.3.1. Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP)

  RFC 3630 [RFC3630] specifies a method of adding traffic engineering
  capabilities to OSPF Version 2. New TLVs and sub-TLVs were added in
  RFC 5329 [RFC5329] to extend TE capabilities to IPv6 networks in OSPF
  Version 3.

  RFC 5305 [RFC5305] specifies a method of adding traffic engineering
  capabilities to IS-IS. New TLVs and sub-TLVs were added in RFC 6119
  [RFC6119] to extend TE capabilities to IPv6 networks.

  Gap: None.

When you talk to your vendor, ask what code will support these RFC¹s.

-Josh

RFC7349 is a nice summary of everything we¹re still missing wrt MPLS and
is relatively recent so should be close to up to date. In addition to the
MPLS shortcomings, it also touches on recent IGP updates:

rfc7439, not 7349:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7439

Nick

FWIW,

draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6 [1] is now at revision 17. But it is complete and totally stable.
It was approved for publication as an RFC on March 4th and the document is currently with the RFC Editor in the "final stages of sausage grinding"

I would predict that you will have an RFC number to reference within about 4 weeks from now.

Adrian

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6/