> We use the following scheme.
> <routername> - <interface designation> <slot number> - <card slot number>
> [<port number> [s <sub-interface number>].<pop>.cic.net.
> where interface designation is [fddi|hssi|ser|ether|fastether|atm|token|pos]
Could we agree on a fixed width interface designation? fe instead of
fastether? tk instead of token? etc..
I agree.. Two letters seems quite sufficient for the time being though
whose to say it will be in the future. It also tends to fix the size
of the hostname.