CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

As people are complaining all around about ISP's,
here is my small question. Who has a _working_ contact at
"CalPOP" (216.240.128.0/19 and others). It is not in puck :frowning:

If anybody has a working one please mail it me offlist so
that the following long version of the problem can be solved.

Is there anything alive at CalPOP that doesn't try
to abuse open proxies for massively spamming hotmail ?

These are the hits from Sep 3rd:

216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:15 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.253.99:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:17 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.167.5:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:19 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.253.230:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:20 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.167.230:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:22 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.254.151:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:24 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.252.99:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:25 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.254.145:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:26 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.252.230:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:26 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.254.140:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:28 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.254.145:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:29 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.252.230:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"
216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:30 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.254.140:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-"

Since 29 Sep they did that 13007 times to the same box.
Quite persistent apparently as previously at 10-15 August
they used 216.240.129.201 + .205 to hit that box for another
17502 times and that one stopped mysteriously after mailing
abuse@calpop.com & noc@calpop.com & sam@calpop.com (as shown in whois).
Unfortunatly without any reply whatsoever and apparently
they are continuing to scan for open http connect proxies.

I know the 200 response should indicate a CONNECT succes.
But unfortunatly if one loads up an apache2 with PHP suddenly
it starts passing _all_ methods to PHP which nicely responds a 200.
But it is perfect for logging some nice data from the wanna-be-spammer.
<Limit CONNECT>Deny from all</Limit> solves that ofcourse but that
spammer needs to go, but the contacts don't work. This acts as a
perfect spamtrap honeypot btw especially as they keep trying.

Before anyone asks the IP being hit is on a DSL line so they are
quite probably scanning all the DSL networks for open proxies.

Greets,
Jeroen

[Spam-L] BLOCK,MISC: WHO'S SPAMMING YOU? (2003-08-27) Top 40 Proxy-Hijacker-Friendly Nets
http://www.monkeys.com/phl/top-20030827.post
10. 216.240.140(4) level3.net - calpop.com (Los Angeles, CA)
                    days.cblock=2
29. 216.240.149(3) level3.net - calpop.com (Los Angeles, CA)
                    days.cblock=5

We consider them a 'possibly rogue operator' at this point.
We have numerous logged instances of unlawful trespass from
their IP space - mail or attempted mail to spamtraps - and
real uglyness like 66.250.115.0/24 (no longer announced by
them) housing the proxy-scanning criminals at nextdatacorp.com/
newengineroom.com. Never a darn word from them, except auto-replies.
Their appearance in RFG's "top-40" list is definitely paving
the way for death-by-ASN-filter (joining 90+ others).

ARIN has marked the contact info for AS 7796 as invalid - BACK IN MAY(!)
- and "Network Operations Account" <nocc-at-webvision.com>
has confirmed to us that they (AS 13374) are not the registrant
of that ASN, but CalPOP is. CalPOP has certainly had every
opportunity to correct the false record(s) in question with
ARIN by now. Unless ARIN steps into this discussion and gives us
a good reason why they haven't updated anything (e.g.: no or
false documentation provided by CalPOP), I'll assume that this
lack of even remotely accurate records for the ASN is deliberate,
rather than mere negligence, and evokes strong suspicions of
this ASN being hijacked, bar evidence to the contrary.

The fact that their upstreams are or have been:
- Level3 (known spammer-tolerant, complaint-ignorant, deliberately hiding
  customers in their IP space without SWIP/rwhois)
- rogue operator AS 22298 (ewan1.com)
  (RIS says they are gone since 2003-08-25)
- Cogent (known spammer-tolerant, complaint-ignorant)
  (RIS says they are gone since 2003-08-06)

lets you expect nothing good coming from calpop.com .

AS 7796 announcing 216.240.128.0/19 as 32 /24's should make some people
here wonder: who the hell am I wasting my router's RAM for, and why am
I still accepting /24's from space other than the traditional swamp?

bye,Kai

ps: RFG's monkeys.com is undergoing a joe-job right now - with the
    suspects most certainly present within (or acting on behalf and in
    concert with) the group of hard-core computer criminals listed in
    his "Top 40" list. Which criminals does your employer support?

> As people are complaining all around about ISP's,
> here is my small question. Who has a _working_ contact at
> "CalPOP" (216.240.128.0/19 and others). It is not in puck :frowning:

> If anybody has a working one please mail it me offlist so
> that the following long version of the problem can be solved.

> Is there anything alive at CalPOP that doesn't try
> to abuse open proxies for massively spamming hotmail ?

[Spam-L] BLOCK,MISC: WHO'S SPAMMING YOU? (2003-08-27) Top 40 Proxy-Hijacker-Friendly Nets
http://www.monkeys.com/phl/top-20030827.post
10. 216.240.140(4) level3.net - calpop.com (Los Angeles, CA)
                    days.cblock=2
29. 216.240.149(3) level3.net - calpop.com (Los Angeles, CA)
                    days.cblock=5

We consider them a 'possibly rogue operator' at this point. We have
numerous logged instances of unlawful trespass from their IP space -
mail or attempted mail to spamtraps - and real uglyness like
66.250.115.0/24 (no longer announced by them) housing the
proxy-scanning criminals at nextdatacorp.com/ newengineroom.com. Never
a darn word from them, except auto-replies. Their appearance in RFG's
"top-40" list is definitely paving the way for death-by-ASN-filter
(joining 90+ others).

I've received responses from Calpop in recent memory. They do seem to be
taking a turn for the worse, however. Whether this is due to malice,
lack of clue, or some combination remains to be seen. (We had some of
those blocks swipped to us from WAY back and it took forever to get them
removed).

Last I checked, the phone number listed (+1-213-351-1355) worked. A call
over there might be helpful. If anyone from Level3 is around, now would
be a good time to smack some clue into them.

ARIN has marked the contact info for AS 7796 as invalid - BACK IN
MAY(!) - and "Network Operations Account" <nocc-at-webvision.com>
has confirmed to us that they (AS 13374) are not the registrant of
that ASN, but CalPOP is. CalPOP has certainly had every opportunity
to correct the false record(s) in question with ARIN by now.

7796 *was* webvision at one point, although they're no longer using this
ASN.[1] Calpop obtained some of Webvision's assets after Webvision
closed their facility in Torrance. I can only assume that ARIN did
require them to re-justify the usage before allowing them to transfer
the allocation, but it's still a little sketchy, as Webvision is still
in business.

I'm pretty sure that Kamron Hejazi hasn't worked there in ages, and
hejazik@webvision.com hasn't been a valid address for quite some time.

I did get a response from ken-at-calpop.com about this issue, although
he didn't quite seem to understand why it mattered that the ASN had an
invalid contact.

To be fair, Webvision COULD fix this problem if they wanted to, since
they could easily reactivate the address and change the POC for 7796.

The fact that their upstreams are or have been:
- Level3 (known spammer-tolerant, complaint-ignorant, deliberately hiding
  customers in their IP space without SWIP/rwhois)
- rogue operator AS 22298 (ewan1.com)
  (RIS says they are gone since 2003-08-25)
- Cogent (known spammer-tolerant, complaint-ignorant)
  (RIS says they are gone since 2003-08-06)

I did see some slight signs of life there at one point. However, it does
seem that they're either totally rogue, totally clueless, or some
combination of the two at this point.

[1] Incidentally, Webvision dropped pretty far into the spam sewer by
the end; their whole /19 was listed in SPEWS, which sucked for us, since
we had about 6-8 /24's out of that.

CalPoP's owners/management are knowingly facilitating this behaviour. I
know, since I (thankfully very briefly) was retained as their CTO and
explicitly raised the spam issue as soon as I became aware of it. I personally
saw machines which appeared to be running software designed to attempt to proxy
relay against Hotmail. The response I received was that "if they did
not generate complaints it was not an issue."

For all the good it will do you, you can reach two of the owners, Richard
Hoover aka Lynn at lynn@calpop.com or Ross Thayer at ross@calpop.com.