Thus said "Vivien M." on Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:05:50 EDT:
> the following != "implies agreeing to an NDA" ??
> 3. The information received via the list is considered
> confidential information, not to be reproduced in any form
> without prior written approval of Exodus.
I hate to argue on NANOG about this, but #3 seems to me like it's an NDA
(although a rather informal one), for all intents and purposes.
If they aren't encrypting the list traffic, then in reality, it isn't
``private'' or ``confidential'' email now is it?