AT&T NOC?

Mailman List Mirror (Read Only)
1

Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try elsewhere?

This is not a NOC at all. This is a mailing list, read by quite a few
network operators, many of whom are not impressed by would be operators
who can not tell a mailing list from a NOC.

Neither are they impressed by people who can't follow simple trains
of thought and paragraph structure.

I'v fired of an email to noc@att.net but havent got anything yet.

Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try
elsewhere?

"This" referring to 'noc@att.net' and not 'nanog@merit.edu'.
I think it was plain from his message ("I need to contact them"
instead of "I need to contact you", etc) that he understood
that 'nanog@merit.edu' isn't the address for AT&Ts NOC.

It's not that I don't appreciate good flames, I just like
them to be properly directed.

SFTS.

B/W/

Brian Wilson --- Engineer, MindSpring Network Operations Center
wilsonb@mindspring.net http://www.mindspring.com
Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge
even where there is no river. -- Nikita Khrushchev

2

>I'v fired of an email to noc@att.net but havent got anything yet.

>Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try
>elsewhere?

"This" referring to 'noc@att.net' and not 'nanog@merit.edu'.
I think it was plain from his message ("I need to contact them"
instead of "I need to contact you", etc) that he understood
that 'nanog@merit.edu' isn't the address for AT&Ts NOC.

I'd better cover my reputation here and pipe in that yep, I
_know_ what nanog is for..hell, I've been on it for a while..I
figured that rather than wait for however long incase noc@att.net
wasnt right, I'd ask here to make sure it wasnt some BOFH redirection
to /dev/null, esp as it was a pretty hair-on-fire situation...

And yes the situation's in hand regarding the bogus routes..and
at&t arent the cause...but the fact that some major NSPs arent
filtering 61/8 at /19 as they probably should be is another
question...