Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 06:12:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Joe Provo - Network Architect <jprovo@ma.ultranet.com>
To: neil@domino.org
Subject: Re: Ascend GRF400
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
[...]
- the grf is not all of ascend. maybe they finally got things
right?
[...]
It is probably useful to differentiate between Netstar, which was
recently acquired by Ascend, and the rest of Ascend. The GigaRouter
was developed by Netstar prior to its acquisition by Ascend.
(I do not know if this is true, but it is a guess). That the Netstar
product did the ATM routing extremely well. I believe that was its
market originally.. All of the other cards, the ether, the new T1 line
cards (hah-hah) maybe even the HSSI cards are all new since Ascend took
them over, to broaden their market.
I hear their ATM interfaces are great, haven't played with them yet though.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the GRF-400 was an Ascend product
and the GRF-1600 is the NetStar GigaRouter, with some additional developments.
The GRF-400 is out there in networks like AGIS, NetRail, PSI, DOMINO and
Savvis. No word on any NetStar-cum-GRF1600 deployments.
Am I right?
--Kent
~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ Note new area code ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~
Kent W. England Six Sigma Networks
1655 Landquist Drive, Suite 100 Voice/Fax: 760.632.8400
Encinitas, CA 92024 kwe@6SigmaNets.com
Experienced Internet Consulting ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~
(If you can't reach me using 760 area code, use the old 619 instead.)
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the GRF-400 was an Ascend product
and the GRF-1600 is the NetStar GigaRouter, with some additional
developments.
The GRF-400 is out there in networks like AGIS, NetRail, PSI, DOMINO and
Savvis. No word on any NetStar-cum-GRF1600 deployments.
Am I right?
My understanding is that the GRF-400 is just a 4 slot version of the
GRF-1600, modulo cosmetic differences, branding etc. Certainly this is one
of the easiest ways that one can take a crossbar switch and produce a cost
reduced, bandwidth reduced midrange.