I was reading an article in the Economist about a new fiber route down the Red Sea from Israel and wondered if there were any branches off of those lines and where the routers were for them. The route kind of made it look like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense to leave them at sea if you could put a router there.
Surprisingly it is power that primarily limits repeater count in undersea spans.
Ie, most available power is going to be eaten up budget wise by the repeaters, leaving none for routers.
It’s not terribly clear that a router would substantially benefit things that a ROADM could not also accomplish, and those do exist in undersea systems.
As routers decrease in power and coalesce with silicon photonics, this may change.
-LB
Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
CEO ben@6by7.net
"The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.”
ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME
I was reading an article in the Economist about a new fiber route down the Red Sea from Israel and wondered if there were any branches off of those lines and where the routers were for them. The route kind of made it look like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense to leave them at sea if you could put a router there.
There's a limited number of possible branches on a cable and as a result you just put the routers on the edges rather than in the middle. What you do put in the water is something like:
The more the active electronics are at the ends rather than in the open ocean the greater the serviceability is and also over the lifetime of the cable the easier it is to upgrade it to higher capacity as the data bearing capacity of a given wavelength increases. The FLAG cable has had for example has has several capacity increases over it's service life which closing in on 25 years at this point.
Amplifiers are still necessary for longer spans but a lot of other logic is not. for situations where the distances are manageable passive unrepeated systems are greatly prefered because it keeps servicing due to electronic faults to a minimum and reduces the cost accordingly. see the recent tonga cable fault and repair for a passive system.
The mean depth of the worlds oceans is around ~3700 meters below MSL which means most service calls involve deploying to the proximate location of the fault, fishing around for a while and then carefully re-laying several kilometers of cable on a splice has been made. which typically takes weeks.
I was reading an article in the Economist about a new fiber route down the Red Sea from Israel and wondered if there were any branches off of those lines and where the routers were for them. The route kind of made it look like it was completely at sea, but it would kind of make sense to leave them at sea if you could put a router there.
The NSA taps aren't really routers per se but networking devices nonetheless.
>
> The mean depth of the worlds oceans is around ~3700 meters below MSL
> which means most service calls involve deploying to the proximate
> location of the fault, fishing around for a while and then carefully
> re-laying several kilometers of cable on a splice has been made.
> which typically takes weeks.
And lots, and lots of $$.
Just arrange for a volcano to go off, and splice then.