> The oem ain't gonna support the resold device either.
Many vendors support resold gear through a recertification cost in order to bring it back under a support contract.
In my world, support ends after 6 months. Period.
It's even worse than that. Mediatek, for example, provides a devkit to
new customers, still, based on the obsolete
LEDE-17 release of openwrt, e.g. 6+ year code. I recently pointed out
to a marketing manager pimping how wifi-7 was going to fix latency on
wifi in 3-4 years, how crappy the factory driver was, compared to
what's now in linux
and asked when they were going to ship that instead, to a blank
stare... And yes, I know of several "new" customers for that chipset
that are using that obsolete code, too scared and incompentent to make
the jump to a more current OS.
If you think that's bad, qualcomm is worse, and I just established a
new record, I think, with truly ancient broadcom's openwrt based
devkit that just shipped with the "NEW" triband tp-link deco series...
Deco XE75 | AXE5400 Tri-Band Mesh Wi-Fi 6E System | TP-Link -
I can hardly bring myself to talk to the sea of CVEs and incompetence
in there... you can start with them STILL shipping dnsmasq 2.62... and
linux 3.3.8.
I used to be really proud that openwrt was used by all these major
manufacturers, but I'd also thought that they'd
have been responsible enough to at least keep up with CVEs, and stay
within a few years of the mainline.
If you are wondering why WiFi-6 works so badly out of the box, or why
ipv6 is not rolling out, you don't have to look much further. The
really, really sad thing, is that the ODM in these cases, just slaps
the devkit and a fancy gui
on top of it, and ships the product, with no further support.
So I kind of view recycling routers, with newer software, as a great
way to clean up the present ecosystem. And if you looked at the first
url I pasted above, with 4x more throughput, and 10x less latency, on
"obsolete", hw.