Gee, what a surprise -- another one:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7561268/
Anyone wanna bet that tomorrow, this number will have
grown "after further examination"...?
- ferg
"A total of four backup tapes were found to be missing from a box that was damaged during shipping between two facilities, the company said. Three of the four tapes have been recovered at the shipper's facility.
So, who else thinks that this is some sort of criminal negligence, puting that kind of sensitive information in such a risky position?
I think that these conpanies (lexis nexis, ameritrade, whoever) should be held *criminally* liable for things like this.
How long until something like the social security administration has an announcement like this? Or, Experian? Transunion? D&B?
* Alex Rubenstein:
I think that these conpanies (lexis nexis, ameritrade, whoever) should be
held *criminally* liable for things like this.
Nulla poena sine lege?
Isn't this slightly off-topic, even by NANOG standards?
This problem is made more intractable by not being able to reassign
identifiers, such as your social security number, or your drivers
license.
If the Federal government were to provide a national ID that was 15
digits randomly assigned, and would associate with a name for
confirmation. Once the number/name is shown to be abused, allow the
individual to obtain a different number. The Feds would return MATCH,
ABUSED, or INVALID on an ID query. Even guessing a valid number would
be right once every 3 million guesses. Also checking against the name
would make this rather difficult to abuse. Offering an ABUSED ID would
be grounds to summon the authorities.
By allowing the individual to report their number as being abused and
having it reassigned, would make catching criminals that use purloined
data far easier.
-Doug