Alternatives to GSLB ?

Greetings, my company has application servers in several strategic locations
throughout the globe. We're currently doing GSLB with a handful of BIND DNS
servers, that return the A records of the closest server(s), based off of
the IP address of the resolver doing the lookup for the client.

GSLB obviously has caveats in this regard, and we are looking for ideas on
how to 1) ensure clients are routed to the closest geographical server 2)
ensure the client hits the server(s) with the shortest path.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks!

Jeff

Anycast works.

[...] we are looking for ideas on

how to 1) ensure clients are routed to the closest geographical server 2)
ensure the client hits the server(s) with the shortest path.

No need to deal with that yourself when BGP eats that problem for breakfast
lunch and dinner.

-Jack Carrozzo

Anycast works.

...with some caveats.

[...] we are looking for ideas on

how to 1) ensure clients are routed to the closest geographical server 2)
ensure the client hits the server(s) with the shortest path.

No need to deal with that yourself when BGP eats that problem for breakfast
lunch and dinner.

-Jack Carrozzo

Note that anycast can and will bite you in the ass
repeatedly as you deploy it over wider and wider
scopes, unless you take careful steps to overcome
the differences in policies and coverage areas with
different networks.

Classic problem:

You peer with network X in the US.
You buy transit from network Y in Asia.
Network Y buys transit from network X in the US.

Network X localprefers customer routes over peer routes.

Your anycast traffic from network X in the US is
suddenly being served from your Asia nodes behind
network Y, because network X prefers the path to your
anycast subnet heard through their customer instead
of the peer-learned path directly from you.

Not saying it won't work; it just takes careful planning,
judicious use of BGP communities to limit route
propagation, and constant monitoring and adjusting
as networks change who they purchase connectivity
from over time.

Matt

I've seen that with clients. It seems like there's a promised anycast
land, out where Akamai is (where you really do have "local" nearly
everywhere globally, so even strange routing foo doesn't mismatch the
path too badly). Between small GSLB optimal solutions and the
promised land, there be dragons, due to the actual one-way routing
dynamics.

I noodled for a while on a mixed anycast-local solution for a
particularly insane client website requirement (never got built, thank
god), with each installation answering both a local GSLB-like address
and the anycast. Had a layer of smart in front of the anycast load
balancer ports to see if routing had done something insane, and to
generate a redirect to the local address closest to the point of
origin.

Never got code working, and talked the client out of the business
requirement, but it might be more practical than moderately complex
anycast's actual practical management problems.

No Akamai traffic is directed via anycast.

Some of the name server IP addresses are anycasted, but that is for redundancy / capacity / name resolution performance, not to direct end users to web servers.

Sorry, didn't mean to imply that. It was suggested in the dark past
that Akamai could or should do that; they didn't.

It was tangental to the point I was making and I simplified wrongly.

Just wanted to thank everyone who replied to my question on the list and
off-list.
Cheers,

Jeff